Weimar and Nazi Germany: Hitler's rise to power 1919-33

邊玩邊學

回答這些題目賺取能量，接著就能釣魚、探索。不需要帳號。

給教育者：為 Weimar and Nazi Germany: Hitler's rise to power 1919-33（History、Period Study）準備好可直接使用的課程投影片, 複習筆記——用於你的課程，或把這個主題當成互動班級活動，讓學習者以即時遊戲的方式進行。

課程筆記

Hitler joined the German Workers’ Party in 1919; it became the NSDAP in 1920. The 25-point programme contained extreme nationalism, antisemitism, racial exclusion and demands for strong central authority, alongside other claims. Party self-description should not be confused with a neutral account of its practice.
The failed Munich putsch in November 1923 led to imprisonment. Hitler began Mein Kampf in 1924; its two volumes appeared in 1925 and 1926. The book promoted racist, antisemitic and expansionist ideas, not reliable explanations of national hardship.
After reorganisation, the party used elections and local campaigning while continuing intimidation and violence. Hitler asserted authority at Bamberg in 1926. Goebbels became Berlin party leader in 1926, national party propaganda leader in 1930 and government propaganda minister in 1933; those appointments should not be merged.

German dependence on foreign credit made it vulnerable to international shocks. Credit withdrawal, banking problems, output cuts and government responses deepened hardship after 1929. Do not say every American loan ended instantly on the day of the crash. Registered unemployment reached roughly six million near the 1932 peak.
The Nazis adapted appeals to different audiences and exploited dissatisfaction, anti-communism and prejudice. Their scapegoating of Jewish people was false. Support varied by class, religion, region and time; many unemployed people supported other parties, and farmers, businesses and middle-class voters were not uniform blocs.
Reichstag seats provide one measure: 12 in 1928, 107 in 1930, 230 in July 1932 and 196 in November 1932. The party remained largest after its November loss but did not have an outright majority. The decline disproves a story of uninterrupted, inevitable electoral growth.

Brüning, Papen and Schleicher served as chancellor between 1930 and January 1933 while Hindenburg was president. Increasing reliance on presidential emergency powers had already weakened parliamentary government. Ebert’s brief 1918 chancellorship belongs to a different period.
Papen and other conservatives negotiated for a cabinet in which they expected to restrain Hitler. Hindenburg appointed him on 30 January 1933. Electoral strength supplied leverage, but neither a direct chancellor election nor an automatic right of the largest party produced the appointment.
Appointment and the subsequent construction of dictatorship are different stages. Conservative choices and failures of restraint mattered; describing Hitler’s accession as inevitable conceals alternatives and responsibility.

Explain the interaction of economic crisis, parliamentary deadlock, prejudice, organisation, propaganda, coercion and elite calculations. An individual speech, slogan or source image cannot establish every voter’s motives.
Some business and conservative figures supplied support or resources, but backing varied and did not form one united explanation for all Nazi gains. Political choices were needed to turn electoral influence into the chancellorship.
Distinguish printed campaign appeals and pre-1933 media access from the later regime’s control of broadcasting and its propaganda ministry. A generated rally picture is contextual interpretation, not an authenticated Hitler speech, evidence of a particular event or a poll of public belief.

Step through every slide for this topic — plus flashcards and revision notes — with a free account.

免費預覽——33 題中的 8 題。註冊即可查看全部。

這個主題的歷屆試題練習即將推出。

即將推出